
The big hotel programmes work in three different ways, and choosing between them is mostly choosing which way suits how you travel. After that it is arithmetic against your own calendar.
Three kinds of programme
Points you redeem for nights. Marriott Bonvoy, Hilton Honors, IHG One Rewards and World of Hyatt. You earn a currency whose value depends on what you redeem it for, and you do not know that when you earn it. The upside is real, and so is the risk of devaluation.
A cash rebate. GHA Discovery, covering Anantara, Kempinski and 53 other brands. There are no points and no award chart. The programme fixes the rate itself at D$1 = USD 1, so you know the value on the day you earn it. You get the stated percentage, with no upside beyond it and no risk.
A paid discount membership. Accor Plus. You buy it, and it gives back a complimentary night plus dining discounts across a large Asian footprint. It is not loyalty in the earning sense. It has a price, and whether it pays is a sum you can do before buying.
Mixing up the first two is why people ask how many points a GHA night costs. Mixing up the third with either is why people expect Accor Plus to reward them for staying more.
Will you reach a tier?
Can you realistically concentrate enough nights in one chain to reach a tier? That settles most cases.
If yes, read the benefit tables, and the programme with the best footprint in your cities wins. Our guides set out what each tier gives: IHG One Rewards, World of Hyatt, Marriott Bonvoy in Asia and Hilton Honors in Asia.
If no, which is most travellers, tier benefits do not matter to you. Two things decide it instead: the rebate you earn without status, and whether your points survive. That favours GHA Discovery, which pays from your first stay with no tier at all. It rules out base-level IHG membership, where points expiry is itself a tier benefit that base members do not have.
Footprint beats benefits
A programme you cannot use is worth nothing, whatever its table promises, and the property list is the check people skip.
- Marriott, Hilton and IHG have real depth across Asian secondary cities.
- Hyatt is excellent where it exists and absent from a lot of the region.
- GHA is concentrated in resort markets, strongest across Thailand, the Maldives, Sri Lanka and Vietnam.
- Accor is deep in Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
Radisson Hotel Group belongs in the count and is the one most often left out. The group describes itself as “an international hotel group with ten distinctive hotel brands, counting more than 1,640 hotels in operation and under development in EMEA & APAC.” That figure mixes open hotels with ones still being built, and neither region it names is the Americas, so the portfolio here differs from the one you know from a US stay. Check it against your own city list on Radisson’s own Asia Pacific rates.
Before committing a year of nights, list the ten cities you slept in last year and count the properties. That one exercise overrides everything above.
Until 12 October 2026, two Experience Packages on that Radisson page add 2,000 bonus Radisson Rewards points per stay. The bonus ends on that date.
- Romance is for members only, booked at the member bed and breakfast rate. It gives breakfast in the room for two, an upgrade when you book a Superior room or above, and up to 15% off. In this region it runs at hotels in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, the Maldives, Fiji and New Zealand, and none in China.
- Park, Stay & Fly bundles a room with parking for one to 15 days. Non-members can book it but do not get the points. Its only Asia Pacific hotel today is in Bangkok.
Stays for both run to 24 November 2026. You pay in full at booking, and cancellation follows each hotel’s own prepaid rate policy.
If status is not the goal, price decides it
If you are not chasing a tier, compare the cash price and treat any points as a small bonus. The chain’s own rate against an aggregator’s shows whether brand loyalty is costing you money on a stay, and on Asian city hotels it often is. Booking.com has the widest Asian property coverage, and Trip.com is usually the stronger of the two on mainland China and Hong Kong rates, so price the stay on both. For a Radisson, the chain price to compare against is on its Asia Pacific rate page.
Booking away from the chain has two costs:
- A third-party booking usually forfeits elite benefits and sometimes earning as well. Booking direct versus an OTA covers this.
- A rebate programme like GHA needs a booking it can see, so an aggregator booking earns nothing there.
Accor Plus comes down to a sum
Accor Plus has a price, a complimentary night and a stated dining discount, so the only question is whether your year holds enough Accor stays and restaurant bills to clear the fee. Does Accor Plus pay for itself works through it with the published numbers. For a lot of Southeast Asia travellers, the dining discount decides it more than the free night does. Do that sum first, and if it comes out in your favour, buy Accor Plus directly here.
Shortcuts for any programme
- Status matching is usually faster than earning from zero if you already hold a tier somewhere.
- Elite night shortcuts covers the credit card and promotion routes that shorten a qualification year.
- What breakfast and lounge access are really worth is the benefit most likely to change which tier you aim for, because in Asian city hotels it carries a real cash value.
- Weighing a redemption you already have points for? Points versus cash is the better page.
Accor Plus, if the arithmetic in that guide comes out in your favour Our full write-up. (affiliate link)
Booking.com, whose Asian property coverage is the widest of any aggregator (affiliate link)
Trip.com, for checking a chain's own rate against an aggregator (affiliate link)
Radisson's own Asia Pacific rates (affiliate link)